Comments on: About Us

By: Steve

Steve — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:08:52 +0000

Amber, the point is that if people are truly concerned about the sanctity of marriage and preserving the institution, they’ll proscribe its greatest threat: Divorce. But of course they’re not concerned about that. Their primary objective is making sure same-sex couples remain second-class citizens.

By: Amber

Amber — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:35:12 +0000

Steve, you state that “if all you pissed off gay-marriage supporters vote for it too, I think we can win!”
Why on earth would gay marriage supporters advocate for legislation created by people who fight to abolish equal marriage rights? That makes no sense.
And how would banning divorce “be a great benefit to society”? If one spouse is in an emotionally and/or physically abusive relationship and cannot legally get out of it, how is that beneficial to anyone?

By: Diana Kennedy

Diana Kennedy — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:15:15 +0000

You know, if you gay people would stop shaming straight people with your loving relationships, your good communication and your loyalty and dedication, then straight people like Newt Gingrich (three wives), Rush Limbaugh (four wives), and Dr. Laura (two husbands) might not hate you so much.

By: Diana Kennedy

Diana Kennedy — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:07:07 +0000

and more participatory!

By: Diana Kennedy

Diana Kennedy — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:06:39 +0000

Absolutely. As Paul says, “It is better to marry than to burn.” But that is it. I can’t believe you even mentioned masturbation, given its clear condemnation in the story of Onan. No spilling seed allowed. Or, as the Saints Python put it, “Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great. If one sperm gets wasted, Gd gets quite irate.”

By: Diana Kennedy

Diana Kennedy — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:02:57 +0000

I think you misunderstand the Bible. Marriage is not, in fact, a vow. It is a business contract. The father of the groom, and sometimes the groom himself, give X amount of livestock to the father of the bride. Of course, sometimes a groom can substitute hard labor for cattle (ie Jacob). Of course, a more direct way of earning a wife is to rape a woman, since then you are *required* to marry the girl you raped. Of course, you don’t have to pay for her, because who would pay for a non-virgin?

By: Jason Jenkins

Jason Jenkins — Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:11:50 +0000

Marriage is a vow between one man and the father(s) of one or more women. Look it up, it’s in the Bible. It’s a scandal that people have tried to redefine it to be a vow between the man and the woman herself, and only one woman.

If it were true that the word “marriage” means exactly one thing and is inviolate (which is a funny idea, because I don’t think of our laws as protecting the rights of words not to be redefined–since when do words have rights?), and that thing that marriage means is discriminatory, then the consequence would be that we need to get rid of government recognition of marriage altogether, possibly replacing it with something whose name the government would be free to define, and that would apply to everyone equally.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 04:10:23 +0000

Wow. Just wow. This website and its comments are proof of the lunacy “religion” propagates. I hope you religious nutjobs don’t ever have children. What’s so ironic is the ultra right wing Christians are just as crazy as the Muslim extremists, they’re just sneakier about getting their distorted views forced upon the population.

God help you all.

By: PaDumBumPsh

PaDumBumPsh — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:01:10 +0000

OK, let's try that again. Here's a bumper sticker idea I threw together back in January. Not a STICKER per se, just a response to all the one man-one woman marriage stickers out there. Feel free to download. Bumper Sticker

By: PaDumBumPsh

PaDumBumPsh — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:53:48 +0000

Well… not a STICKER per se… just something I threw together to make a point.
Feel free to download.