<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buy a t-shirt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rescuemarriage.org</link>
	<description>Safeguarding marriage from the evils of divorce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyM</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-4749</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 05:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-4749</guid>
		<description>I wish this came in small!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish this came in small!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peyton</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Peyton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>HA!!! your comment had me literally laugh out loud. To funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA!!! your comment had me literally laugh out loud. To funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezekiel23:20</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezekiel23:20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>If divorce was banned, the murder rate wouldn&#039;t go up, but adultery would become perfectly acceptable. It would be a death blow for marital fidelity. However, if that&#039;s what it takes to see same sex marriage come in, it&#039;s worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If divorce was banned, the murder rate wouldn&#8217;t go up, but adultery would become perfectly acceptable. It would be a death blow for marital fidelity. However, if that&#8217;s what it takes to see same sex marriage come in, it&#8217;s worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3384</guid>
		<description>Altar, not alter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Altar, not alter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Jernigan</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3369</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Jernigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3369</guid>
		<description>I second that! Why should we be able to pick &amp; choose which parts of the Bible to follow. Futhermore, if the whole issue is religion and there is supposed to be a separation of church &amp; state, then marriage itself should not legally be recognized! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that! Why should we be able to pick &amp; choose which parts of the Bible to follow. Futhermore, if the whole issue is religion and there is supposed to be a separation of church &amp; state, then marriage itself should not legally be recognized! <img src='http://rescuemarriage.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Jernigan</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3368</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Jernigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3368</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I tried to no avail to explain this to one of my friends who lives in CA. But instead, she just came back with &quot;people have the right to get a divorce&quot;... *sigh* She didn&#039;t listen to me AT ALL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I tried to no avail to explain this to one of my friends who lives in CA. But instead, she just came back with &#8220;people have the right to get a divorce&#8221;&#8230; *sigh* She didn&#8217;t listen to me AT ALL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3363</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3363</guid>
		<description>Maybe this bill should require couples who divorce to marry someone of the same sex!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this bill should require couples who divorce to marry someone of the same sex!! <img src='http://rescuemarriage.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElleDub</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3360</link>
		<dc:creator>ElleDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3360</guid>
		<description>Er, the &quot;do&quot; goes with the &quot;we&quot; not with the &quot;DEATH&quot;, sorry. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, the &#8220;do&#8221; goes with the &#8220;we&#8221; not with the &#8220;DEATH&#8221;, sorry. <img src='http://rescuemarriage.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElleDub</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>ElleDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>Actually it has nothing to do with the subjunctive. It&#039;s inverted syntax. The &quot;do&quot; goes with the &quot;we,&quot; not with the &quot;Does.&quot; -- We do part. Til death do we part -- We do part only in death. See?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it has nothing to do with the subjunctive. It&#8217;s inverted syntax. The &#8220;do&#8221; goes with the &#8220;we,&#8221; not with the &#8220;Does.&#8221; &#8212; We do part. Til death do we part &#8212; We do part only in death. See?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Tang</title>
		<link>http://rescuemarriage.org/buy-a-t-shirt/comment-page-2/#comment-3351</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Tang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rescuemarriage.org/?page_id=169#comment-3351</guid>
		<description>&quot;&#039;til death do WE part.&quot; sounds grammatically more correct to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8217;til death do WE part.&#8221; sounds grammatically more correct to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
